这么多年我大致搞清楚鹰派鸽派的区别了

鹰派关注通胀，而通胀高，资本收入将会减少。在外交政策上，鹰派负责打仗摧毁一切，而，一无所有，到建设全面的过程，也是有利资本，就好象穷国资本涌入，而建设完了，资本收益不高了，资本就要逃离一样（战争只会发生在距离很远的两个国家，且这两个国家经济实力悬殊，比如以前发达国家的殖民地都发生过战争行为，最终就是控制不发达国家地区的劳动力和资源。但是一战二战却发生在经济相仿的国家，我指的是欧洲的主战场。中国不会跟任何国家打仗，而只会像发达国家那样，发生零星的恐怖袭击事件。中国和日本也不会打仗）




通胀高有利穷人或者说，很多人可以过，比如不劳而获的福利生活，或者本来没有那么高收入却可以找到高收入的工作


The underlying distinction between a dove and a hawk is their outlook on inflation. Doves, named after the unassertive bird, are none too concerned with inflation’s impact on the greater society. A dove will speak and act in a way that downplays inflation’s impact on the economy, and will promote monetary policies in line with their conviction. For example, a dove will come out in favor of lowering interest rates, or at least not raising them, for they are not concerned with the potential inflation that typically accompanies sustainably low rates.


In stark contrast, a hawkish point of view is one that is extremely concerned with the presence of inflation. Named after the ever-vigilant predator, hawks remain watchful for all indicators of rising inflation to ensure their ability to act quickly. A hawk is a person who believes inflation is a disease that will kill economies from the inside, and that swift action must be taken to prevent it.